Improv Alive Talks Improv and Active Listening on King 5 News’ New Day NW

Whether it’s an uncontrollable desire to be right, fear of failure, fear of not looking good or a lack of self-confidence, there are a lot of people talking these days, but it seems fewer people are taking the time to really listen to what’s being said. Engaging in active listening may take a little extra effort and the gumption to ‘step out’, but the skill of active listening is more important to learn and use than ever before. Today I had the pleasure of interviewing (and playing) with Margaret Larson on King 5 News morning talkshow, New Day NW about how improvisation (improv) can be used by individuals, families, teams, companies, communities and countries can use the fundamentals of theater improv to improv their personal and work lives, and foster meaningful relationships. Here’s the episode link:

How to YES AND at Work

How to YES AND at Work

Approaching a dialogue with a YESAND mindset requires two things from you, to YES and to AND.

  First the YESYESing someone in a conversation requires you to make it a point, for the duration of the conversation, to consciously, completely focus on what the other person is communicating to you and nothing else. In order to YES someone, you must set aside your agenda (your desire to affect an outcome that achieves your goal or desire), and really, truly, genuinely listen to them. In the act ofYESing someone, you are fully focused on them, considering everything they are saying, and disengaging the mental process of judging the value of what’s being said, or determining if you agree or disagree. You are simply listening without judgement or agenda. You’ve done this effectively when the person you’re speaking with experiences the sense that they have been heard and that you have considered what they have said. That’s the ‘YES’ part.

  Now the AND part: ANDing is adding to the conversation in a way that will not be received by the other person as your being antagonistic, negative, attacking, or a dismissive of what they are saying. When ANDing someone, you are only adding to or building on the conversation with responses that are constructive and that support the other persons’ feeling that you are listening to them and that you authentically value they’re contribution to the conversation. You’ve done this effectively when the person you’re speaking with experiences that you get the importance of what they are saying, and you are enrolled with them in improving or resolving the problem.

  YES-ANDing may often look like agreement, but it certainly doesn’t have to. In a conversation, it is not just being a Yes Man, agreeing with everything everyone says; it’s an exercise, an activity in which you commit to 1. Listen to and2. Build on someone else through conversation with them. The hardest part of practicing the YES-AND mindset in real life is getting past our desire to be right, or to get what we want from the conversation. ‘Letting someone else win’ is usually not a comfortable thing to do, however, the value of deliberately engaging in the YES-AND mindset with someone is that you will have the opportunity to observe and experience what effect this ‘unnatural’ approach has on the conversation, and on the relationship as people begin to trust the new dynamic and enjoy conversations with you. The effect, very often, is an increased capacity to listen (by all parties in the conversation), and an increased sense of respect and willingness to further open up and engage in dialogue.

  For more on Yes And from a number of another respected authorities on the subject, check out this article on the IRC Improv Wiki.

The Three Improv Concepts that will Transform Your Company Culture and Save You Money

The Three Improv Concepts that will Transform Your Company Culture and Save You Money

I recently came across a shocking statistic in an article written by Niall McCarthy, Data Journalist for Forbes Magazine. The city of Seattle is ranked the tenth city in the entire nation for most hours per week worked by the average employee. According to Naill’s research, the average worker puts 47.23 hours per week in at the office/workplace. On top of that, according to Rachel Dicker in an article in the USNews, Seattle is ranked number 6 in the nation for most traffic congested cities in the nation.. and I’m thinking to myself, “that’s a lot of time spent going to, at, and coming home from the office!” Knowing what commute gridlock does to my sense of peace, (and I work from home), I had to wonder what mental state those people who commute to an office and back home every day are bringing to their teams at work, and their families at home. And what if their workplace is one of chaos, negativity or conflict? Well, that brings things to a whole new level altogether!   Since I am in the business of helping business reap the financial, morale and social benefits of employing an engaged, fulfilled and communicating workforce, I had to wonder: what is the effect of the crazy number of hours we’re putting in, and the stress that is commonly associated with being a part of a workforce? The complete answer to this question is three things: 1. Complex, 2. Unhelpful and 3. A very substantial financial loss to organizations from a lack of employee morale and productivity.   Maybe we can’t wave the magic wand and magically fix our traffic problems or disappear 5-10 hours off of our average workweek, but there are steps that companies and their employees can take to move the needle in a positive direction, towards creating your engaged, fulfilled and communicating workforce. Here are three of them, and they come from the world of theater Improvisation (Yes, Improv!)
  1. Redefine FAILURE: Business Leaders, how do your managers who report to you, and the individual contributors who report to them react to their own personal failures and the failures of those who report to them? What is your relationship to failure? Human beings (being what they are) tend to close off, go internal, try to hide failures, labeling them ‘negative’ instead of opening up, becoming vulnerable, sharing the failure. You business leaders are smart so rather than telling you the rest, let me ask you; what’s the result of your, and your managers, default reaction to failure? If everybody’s reaction was one of opening up, becoming vulnerable and transparent for all to see and learn, what difference would that make?

  2. Approach Your Interactions with Others with a ‘YES AND’ Mindset: ‘Yes And’ is about acceptance and addition. Consider for your next team meeting, devoting the entire meeting to employing a ‘Yes And’ mindset with everybody in that meeting, for the duration of that meeting. This is not to say be a “Yes person”, going along with every suggestion that everybody says. A ‘Yes And’ mindset is ACCEPTANCE = Regardless of if you subscribe to or agree with what’s being said, find a way to respond in any way other than one that is a shut-down of the other person. For example, you may know that adding an additional wing to the office is simply not possible in the 2018 budget, but rather than saying “That is not possible. We don’t have the budget for it.”, consider expressing agreement that things are cramped here in the office, AND offer your sincere desire (and perhaps a timeline) to work closely with them to come up with some good short-term solutions that will address and remedy this very valid problem. This is the ‘Yes And’ mindset, and it works because it shows the person your interacting with that you are actually listening to them, and that you honor them as evidenced by the fact that you see their concern as valid and you’re willing to take action on it, or even just continue the conversation on it.

  3. Make the Other Person Look Good: Do you know why great stage improvisers seem so witty, brilliant, quick and entertaining? Here’s a clue: It’s not because they are particularly witty, brilliant, quick or funny as individuals. It’s because they are those adjectives as a TEAM. How are they that way as a team? They are that way because each and every individual on that improv team is doing everything for the others on their team. The individuals in a great improv troupe don’t seek the limelight, they don’t try to deliver the perfect one-liner, they only devote their full attention, their expression, their talent to one thing, making the other person look good. That’s the beginning and the end of it. Try this on for yourself for one day. I challenge you to devote one full day, from the buzz of the alarm clock to the clicking off of your bedside lamp, to making someone else look good, be the success, get the credit. Try it and write me and let me know what happened. I DARE YOU! 🙂

  Of course, another amazing way to move the needle for your organization is to consider a conflict management workshop or workshop series with Improv Alive! We blend conceptual and experiential learning and deliver a powerful, immersive experience that gives your employees the tools they need to deal with difficult personalities and hard conversations in an effective and empowering way with tangible and measurable results in employee satisfaction and workforce productivity. Check out our cool video on Conflict Management.    

An Improvisational Mindset as a Guide to Salary Negotiation

The Effectiveness of Yes, And in Hiring

The Effectiveness of Yes, And in Hiring

As some may know, I’ve spent the past 10 years leading two lives.. Professionally speaking. One leading an applied improvisation practice (Improv-Alive), and the other, a technical recruiting practice (DyNexus Recruiting & Staffing)  One thing I know for sure is this: of all the topics that can blow-up a potentially positive hire, conflicting views on salary is one of the top deal-killers. It’s important for both the hirer and the candidate to view the compensation negotiation process as a collaborative effort rather than a competitive one.

There’s a concept that was born in the world of improv-acting called the ‘Improvisational Mindset’.  When applied to the business of salary negotiation, it’s a simple way to make this unavoidable conversation one that serves to drive progress rather than conflict.  An Improvisational Mindset helps you, when interacting with others, to find a positive starting point and build on it, rather than take your position and support/defend it.  You want a negotiation on salary to be a collaborative conversation, and not a competitive one.

Here’s an example of common landmine that can come up during the hiring process, and how an Improvisational Mindset can make the interviewing and negotiating process more effective.

Conversation: Pay…

Many, many times, hirers are quick to adopt the mindset that a candidate shouldn’t get more than a (X)% increase in pay from their last job. This position is common amongst hirers, partly because they often feel that it’s “negotiating”, and can end up saving them money if the candidate accepts. However, is that actually a fact? Does acting within this mindset really bring additional value to the hiring company?

When you consider the financial investment involved in hiring and onboarding a new employee and the risk you are taking that this person you just hired might be anything other than smart, decent, productive and loyal, and you weigh that against the potential gain of hiring an employee who, on day one, is happy to be here and grateful to his new company for paying him what the market considers a fair wage; is it really worth it for you to engage from a mindset that has you positioning for a better deal at your potential employee’s expense, as your first serious interaction with her?

Let’s do the numbers to find out:  Take a piece of paper and draw a vertical line down the middle, dividing the page in half. On the left-hand side, figure how much money you safe or lose at the end of 1 year when you hire a candidate at $10K below fair market value and that candidate generates as much as the weakest link on you team is generating for your company at the end of one year. Now, on the other side of the page, figure how much money you gain or lose when you hire a candidate at fair market value and that candidate generates as much as the strongest link on your team is generating for your company after one year. Now, look at these two numbers.. Which one is better for your bottom line?

  An Improvisational Mindset in this case might have you considering where the candidate is coming from.  For example, that candidate may very well be leaving a company that was vastly underpaying him or her, and their whole reason for considering joining your company is to be paid what the market is bearing for someone of her caliber and experience.

  So, if long-term loyalty is what you want from your employees, you may see this shift in thought as your investment in a positive, respectful beginning of a relationship (Improvisational Mindset), rather than the chance to keep an extra several thousand bucks in payroll (Me VS. You).

It takes a shift in point-of-view, and some courage to adopt an Improvisational Mindset, but it’s effective, and contagious! Plus, you may find the challenge to be one that spurs growth both as a professional and as a person living on the earth.

Improvisationally Speaking Episode 11 with JACK TUCKER of SPACEX

Jack Tucker on Improvisationally Speaking

Jack Tucker on Improvisationally Speaking

As many children do with their parents, Jack Tucker would peer into the night sky with his father and study the heavens. His father teaching him about the constellations and the boundless wonder that exists beyond the clouds. The thing is, this sense of wonder never left Jack, and as his friends and classmates were choosing their paths, Jack kept his head in the stars. Today, he is the manager of Master Scheduling with commercial space exploration company, SpaceX. As the keeper of the clock, his decisions effect the careers, and lives of important people in his company and throughout the entire industry. With these kind of stakes riding on his decisions and actions, you’d think the risk of an improvisational mindset and approach to his work would be entirely out of the question, but it’s absolutely not. Check out our latest Improvisationally Speaking Podcast Episode and learn how Jack Tucker uses improv to help make the most effective & efficient private space exploration company also one of the most safe.

Improvisationally Speaking Podcast interview with CAPTAIN ENCOURAGEMENT (a.k.a Nicholas Domingo)

Captain Encouragement: Saving the world one compliment at a time!

Captain Encouragement: Saving the world one compliment at a time!

Nicholas Domingo was a little chubby, and had crooked teeth as a kid. He was a target for bullies. and as he grew, he learned to channel his negative energy into his training to become a semi-pro football player, a weight-lifter, and a cage-match and street fighter. A brain hemorrhage at the age of 19, and the death of 3 of his best friends turned his life upside-down, and changed his life trajectory forever. There are no super-gadgets that can help you deal with bullies. No special powers that can magically heal hurt feelings. In the comics, obstacles are usually overcome by fists and willpower, but that’s not how it works in the real world. Nicholas Domingo was walking down the streets of L.A. one day and he decided to just start doling out compliments to the people he walked past. As he saw their faces light up, he realized that the world needed a superhero who CAN deal with those complex issues. A real live hero who resolves conflict without violence; whose superpowers are infectious positivity and the ability to encourage people to do their best and spread kindness. And so, burning with the desire to help the world, Nicholas transformed into Captain Encouragement. His mission: to perpetuate positive change in the world, starting by giving all children the tools to break the cycle of violence that is inherent in our society and the media. Taking advantage of the world’s unprecedented interconnectivity, Captain Encouragement travels from school to school, library to community center, across the country, to wake up the new generations, and trade our apathy and isolation for the love and kindness of a more positive humankind.

Improvisationally Speaking Podcast interview with Frank Abagnale, inspiration for the movie & musical, Catch Me If You Can

Frank Abagnale

Frank Abagnale

In this week’s Improvisationally Speaking podcast, we are joined by Frank Abagnale. His fascinating life was one of constant improvisation, and the inspiration for the movie Catch Me If You Can. To hear the podcast, visit our podcast page here. Or you can read the transcript below.



Julian: So last month I attended a technical conference in Florida where the keynote speaker was Frank Abagnale. And it was kind of a trip because this is the man who was the inspiration for Steven Spielberg’s 2002 film Catch Me If You Can starring Leonardo Dicaprio playing him, and Tom Hanks, and subsequently turned into a musical that was a Tony Award winning one. It ran on Broadway and then it ran around the country. His keynote was fascinating. It was basically him just talking about his life—from his early life as depicted in the movie and the musical—where he was known as the world’s most famous con man, up to when he joined the FBI catching people like the person he was when he was young. And I thought to myself, “What a perfect, perfect person to interview for Improvisationally Speaking! Who better knows improvisation than someone who, in real life, impersonated a doctor, a pilot, a professor? Nowadays Frank Abagnale is a lecturer for the FBI Academy and for the field offices of the FBI. He’s a faculty member at the National Advocacy Center. Through his company, Abagnale and Associates, he works with more than 14,000 financial institutions, and corporations, and law enforcement agencies around the world helping them to get the upper hand on fraud and fraudulent activities.

I’m really pleased to have Frank Abagnale on the program today!

From the Improv Alive! Studios in Seattle, Washington, I’m Julian Schrenzel and you are listening to Improvisationally Speaking.




Julian: Frank Agagnale, thank you and welcome to Improvisationally Speaking.


Frank: Good to be here. Thank you.


Julian: I remember hearing you talk about your experiences as a child and as a young person and you described what you did—the things that you did, that were not legal and the things that you did to…con, essentially…and you described them as unremarkable. And to illustrate, you point to a series of uncomplicated steps that you took in order to accomplish these things. But when I thought about it, what I think is that the public at large looks not at the difficulty or the complicatedness of the steps that you took, but more at your ability to execute those actions being the amazing thing that kind of stood out. And I wanted to ask you, Frank: why do you think you were able to execute the actions that you did more easily, it seems, than most anybody else?


Frank: Well, I truly believe, and I know I get these comments all the time, you know, that you’re a genius, you’re brilliant. I was just a child and I think that’s why I was so successful. I ran away from home, I found myself on the streets of New York, so it was “How am I going to survive?” And the only thing I had going for me is I looked a lot older than sixteen, but I think that most of it came from being an adolescent who had no fear of being caught, no thinking about consequences of what will happen when I get caught. I always believed that, had I been a little older, had I been twenty-one or twenty-five when I started to do these things, I wouldn’t have done half of them because I would have sat out there and thought to myself, “That’ll never work, they’ll never believe this…” I would have rationalized everything and never did it. For example, you know, when I stood out in front of a bank with a $500 check and I was going to go in and cash that check, I didn’t sit there and think to myself, “Okay now, here’s the plan…I’m gonna go in…if they say this, I’ll do this…if they do this, then I’ll do this…” I just went in and did it. It was just adlibbed and I think that was truly the adolescent in me. It kind of reminds me of when I’m on the interstate and a kid drives by me doing a hundred miles an hour and I think to myself: look at this crazy kid and then you realize when you were a kid, you did those things. You just didn’t have that fear and thought about all the consequences that go along with it. And I think that was the real key to my success. Yes, I was creative and yes, I was very much an opportunist and saw things other people didn’t see and took advantage of them, but I truly believe the key to it all was the fact that I was so young.


Julian: You know, even people like, for instance, myself—my brother and I have a relationship where we like to go out and—it’s part of my improvisational background—we go out and we do things that are kind of outlandish. They’re not detrimental to anybody. They’re certainly not illegal, but they’re things that regularly you probably wouldn’t do because they’re kind of silly. Like walk into a store and sing a song to the cashier, serenade the cashier, or do something crazy. But even with no stakes attached like that—nothing to gain, nothing to lose—that is something that almost nobody is really able to do because it’s just so hard, so I get what you’re saying, Frank, about that there was no big stakes attached to it and you were doing it to survive. But can you tell me, can you at all describe what is it, how were you able to remain focused and calm in these kind of situations where, you know, the time where you took the role, the job in the hospital as a leader, a team leader, at the hospital? How were you able to remain so calm and in a place where you could function in your head when you knew you were just so pulling the wool over people’s eyes?


Frank: I mean, it was interesting, I watched an interview with Leonardo Dicaprio where he was asked about me and he said, “You know, Frank Abagnale has to be one of the greatest actors that ever lived because this person was playing the part of several people twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. He always knew who he really was, but he got up in the morning and he started acting and he acted till he went to sleep, and then he got up and started acting again and I think a lot of that is true. And now, I was very much, you know, I saw things that, everything…people always say, you know, “I watched the movie, I thought, ‘Wow, how’d this guy do all these things?’ But then I read the book…” And they said, “You know when you read the book, you see how a lot of this stuff, you just kind of fell into, you didn’t premeditate it.” And I agree. If I’d premeditated it, none of it would have worked, so you know, I started cashing checks and it was very hard because I’d go in a bank and they’d say to me, “Well, you don’t have an account here…we don’t normally cash checks for people who don’t have an account…you can go over and speak to that man or woman behind the desk and see if they’ll okay it…” I’d have to go over and give them some kind of sad story and once in a while they said okay. Sometimes they said no. And then, all of a sudden I’m walking up the street in New York, I’m sixteen, I see this airline crew come out of the hotel and I thought to myself, “Wow! If I could get that pilot’s uniform, then I’d walk in the bank and I want to cash a check, I’m this pilot from out of town, I ran a little low on cash…” –of course, this is back before ATMs and debit cards—never dreaming of anything beyond that other than, “If I can get this uniform…” Then I happen to go by the PanAm building and I thought that would be a great airline to use, so, you know, I placed the phone call to PanAm. Right away, the first thing that came to my mind, I asked for somebody in purchasing, I gave them a story that I was a pilot with PanAm, been with the company seven years, I was on a trip to New York leaving later in the day, I had sent my uniform out the day before to be dry-cleaned, now the cleaner can’t find it, the hotel can’t find it. They asked me if I had a spare uniform. I said yes, back in San Francisco where I’m based and the next thing led to the guy saying, “Well, you’re going to have to get another uniform, you have to pay for it, you have to go down to this company.” Which was nothing more than social engineering at the time, but I didn’t think of social engineering, but that is what they would call it today. But I got all this information over the phone, so I went down, I got the uniform. I thought I would have to pay for it. I had the money to pay for it. But then the guy said, “Well, we don’t take cash. You have to bill it back to your uniform allowance, so just give me your employee number.” I saw how many boxes were on the IBM card, I filled in the boxes and I got the uniform. And it was like night and day. I mean, I walked in the bank, I walked up to the teller: Could I cash a check? I don’t have any cash. Absolutely. You don’t have your company ID? No problem at all. Didn’t have to speak to anybody. Didn’t have to worry about how much money. And I realized right then at sixteen years old the power of that uniform, that people were just seeing the uniform and they weren’t even paying attention to the check I was writing. And then, here I go out to the airport and I’m going to buy a flight on TWA, a ticket, and the ticket agent says to me, “Are you flying or riding?” I beg your pardon? “Are you paying for the ticket? Or are you riding the jump seat?” I said, “The jump seat?” “Yes.” I said, “Well, uh, no, I’ll do the jump seat.” And I didn’t even realize you could do that. Then the next thing you know I’m flying all over the world for free, riding in the jump seat of all these planes, I’m staying at these hotels where the crews stay, I’m billing it back to the airline…all those things.

When it came to the doctor, I had moved to Atlanta and I had moved in an apartment complex and it was a singles’ complex, and on the application it asked occupation and I didn’t want to write down airline pilot because it had all these questions about employer’s name, supervisor’s name, contacts, phone contacts, so I thought to myself: I need to come up with something different, so I just said I was a doctor. I didn’t even go into any detail and the woman said, “Oh wow, what kind of doctor?” You know, I’m young, I’m seventeen, eighteen, and I said, “Um, I’m a medical doctor.” “Oh, really? Well, what kind of doctor are you?” Then I thought: well, this is a singles’ complex, so obviously there’s no children here. So I said I’m a pediatrician. And then the next thing you know I move in as this pediatrician and I meet a real pediatrician and I started having conversations with him. We become little friends and he takes me up to this hospital and he introduces me to other doctors and people at the hospital, and then one day, he simply says to me, “One of the doctors had an emergency, he had to go back to the west coast, he had a death in his family…we were wondering if you could supervise a shift? It’s just supervision, no medical treatment, but if you could just take over this shift…” And I at first said, “There’s no way I could do that, I’m not licensed to practice medicine in Georgia, just California where I hold my residency…” “Oh, no, that’s no necessary, this is just an administrative position temporarily.” So then it was more of well, could I get away with this? You know, I went and did it and I just basically, again, was just basically following people’s leads. I mean, again, if I had said I’m going to Georgia, I’m going to become a doctor and…it would have never happened.

And the same thing occurred basically, you know, with the lawyer. I met a—in the movie, it’s a little different—but in real life I met an Eastern Airlines flight attendant, I was dating her, her father was the Attorney General in Louisiana, she asked me to come home and meet her folks. Again, back in those days, a lot of pilots had other jobs—they were lawyers, they were accountants because they were only allowed to fly eighty hours a month, so I happened to say to her I was a lawyer, oh my dad’s a lawyer and he’s in Louisiana and then that led me to Louisiana. I think everything I kind of just fell into, but had I ever set out and planned all of that, none of that would have ever happened.


Julian: When you describe these things, it’s almost like you’re reporting, like you’re a reporter and you’re objectively looking at it and describing it. In your work now, does this—this has got to carry over—I think, I would say this must be part of your personality, is to almost be objective in how you look at a situation, like taking yourself out of it. Does this play…I mean, this is a trait of yours and I think it has served you well—obviously, it served you back in the day—but does it serve you in your current work? You currently work for the FBI now. Does it serve you now?


Frank: Yes. I’ve been at the FBI for forty-one years working with the Bureau. I started out doing undercover work more than forty years ago and I think that the whole purpose of what I was able to do back then was that they would simply say to me, “I need you to go and apply for this job, at this place, basically: here is the paperwork, you are a social worker, you have a Master’s degree in social work, you graduated from Columbia, this is your name, this is your background. We don’t have an inside person there, so you need to go apply for this job along with other people who are applying for it and try to get the job because we need to get you in there to try and find something out. Well, I would go do those kinds of assignments, but I would literally go in and apply with other real people who were actually social workers, or had a degree, and go do the job and get the job.

And even today, I always put myself, you know, if I try to figure out how somebody’s doing something, then I just ask myself: if I was doing this, how would I do it? And the things that have changed—of course, you know, forty years ago, there were no computers and no internets or things like that, so a lot of it is cyber-related—so I’ve had to learn all that. I’ve had to learn as I’ve gone along just like anybody else about how these crimes work and how people think. But social engineering has not really changed much. It’s the same thing that I did fifty years ago when I was a teenage boy. It’s the same thing they do today only they have the ability of using the internet, the computer, the phone, text mail, and things like that, but it’s basically the same thing—getting information from people and people giving you information by social engineering. And the truth is there is no technology to defeat that, just education. You have to educate people how to recognize social engineering.


Julian: Yes, exactly. But now in your work, when you started working with the FBI, now all of a sudden you’re having to do those things, you’re having to play a part, but unlike when you were a child, now there’s a lot of stakes in it, isn’t there? So is there anything you might add to how you were able to keep yourself cool, calm and collected now that there are stakes involved? You were still able to do it.


Frank: I just think that, you know, it’s like when people say, “How do you get up in front of 20,000 people at a commencement and speak? Aren’t you nervous?” I don’t have a nervous bone in my body and I think, you know, I don’t get nervous. I just do whatever I’m supposed to do and I go out and do it and I don’t overthink it or anything like that. I just take whatever I need to do and I go do it. I don’t get nervous about it. I have a lot of confidence in myself which I did when I was sixteen. I always believed that I can do this, I can pull this off, whether it was going to the hospital and saying I can pretend to be a doctor. The only thing I was smart enough to know was the thing about you can fool some of the people some of the time. I was smart enough to know you can’t fool people all of the time. So this is why when people go, “Why did you stay there being the lawyer? You passed the bar. Why didn’t you stay there practicing law?” Because I was smart enough to know that, sooner or later, someone would catch on or someone would start looking into my background. I was smart enough that it could only work for a short period of time. And it’s the same way when I deal with criminals today—they might be smart 99% of the time, but 1% of the time they’re going to make a mistake and I’m just looking for that mistake and I know what that mistake is usually going to be, so I wait for them to make that mistake, or I seek out what that mistake is.


Julian: What is the most exciting part of your job to you now?


Frank: I think it’s just the same thing, you know, it used to be that the cat was chasing the mouse and now the mouse is chasing the cat and now I’m kind of that cat. I used to be the mouse and now I’m the cat and I chase people. It’s always challenging because there’s always something new to try to figure out and how people’s minds work. People are extremely creative and so you just try to figure out what they’re doing and again, I put myself in their place and say: if I was going to do this, how would I do this? If it’s a financial crime, I think to myself: if I had to move this money, how would I move this money? If I had to hide this money, how would I hide this money? And that’s always worked for me. It’s just putting myself in the place of that mind. So, give you a perfect example: I have been involved in some great technologies as an advisor. I’m working on one right now called Trusona which will do away with the need for passwords. The CEO of that company who’s brilliant, he was asked by a reporter, that one time… that said, “You work with Frank Abagnale a lot, he’s your advisor on a lot of great technologies you’ve created for banks and fraud detection that are used all over the world, but my question to you is: Frank doesn’t write code.” And the CEO whose name was Ory Ison said, “No, Frank doesn’t write code, but I’m not a criminal. I can’t think like Frank. So I can develop all the code in the world, I can develop all the software in the world, but I can’t think like Frank thinks so Frank and I, over the last fifteen years, just played chess together. I sit down and say, “Here’s what I’ve developed,” and Frank says, “Well, here’s how I defeat that.” And then I go back and I fix it and then I come back and he says, “Well, you still have a loophole right here because someone could do this…” And then I go back and fix that, and until the day that Frank says to me, “Well, I think you’ve closed all the doors and locked all the doors for now…so you can put this in the marketplace, but you need to make sure you stay on top of it year to year to make sure that it’s as good and secure as it is today.” And he said, “I can’t do that, I don’t have the mind he has, I don’t think like he has and you know, that’s just what he brings to the table.”


Julian: How has your appetite for excitement or adventure changed from when you were younger to now?


Frank: I don’t have all that excitement. It’s more about the curiosity and solving something. I don’t get real…like when I was younger and solving the case, or working on some project and got very excited about it. Now it’s kind of become a bit more routine in my life. It’s just more about doing whatever I’m supposed to do and getting it done. I do like…I teach at the FBI Academy and, you know, I enjoy teaching young agents.

What I find today, which is amazing to me, is that a lot of young people today are not resourceful at all. I mean, they are not at all resourceful, so if you say to a seventeen year-old today in New York City, “I’m going to take your phone away and I need you to find your way back to Richmond, Virginia,” they would be in a total loss. They wouldn’t know where to begin, what to do, how am I going to get back, I have no money. They’re not resourceful, so I try to teach them 1) to be very resourceful and 2) to think out of the box—that not everything is black and white, so what you see is not always that way. You need to look beyond that and figure it out. So sometimes they say to me, “Well look, you already know who did it, so why don’t you just tell us?” No, I’m not gonna do that. I think I know who did it, but you need to figure out who did it.


Julian: If you were to give one piece of advice to people who are a community of less resourceful people who have not developed that resourceful muscle, what is that change that needs to take place? I mean, it’s not just hey, get used to carrying a map. It’s more of a mindset, isn’t it? And what is that?


Frank: Well, yeah, I think you have to understand people. You have to be observant. You have to be a little bit creative. And you have to stop and think for a minute and think things through. I think everything today with young people today is: I gotta have it immediately, I’ve gotta do it immediately, there’s only one way to do it and that’s the fastest way. That’s not always the best way. So I think if you stop really and think out and think to yourself: how do I accomplishment this and how do I go about doing it correctly? You can do that instead of just rushing into it and not thinking it out. That’s what happens today with a lot of technology that is brought to the marketplace, a lot of solutions that are brought to the marketplace, is that the marketeers are pushing it out on the street before anyone has ever said, “Well, wait, this isn’t foolproof. Someone could beat this. Aren’t you going to stop and figure out all the loopholes before you put it in the marketplace? Otherwise there’s going to be victims who use this technology.” And I think that’s what you have to do: you have to stop and think through it before rushing out to get it out.

Now I always remind people about creativity. You know, if someone goes and robs a bank tomorrow and sticks a gun in somebody’s face, nobody cares about that guy, he gets locked up and sent to jail. If the guy that goes in the bank behind him is very creative and he finds some way to swindle the bank through some very amazing ideas and things that he does, he’s kind of become a hero in the public’s eye and they think, “Wow, that guy’s pretty cool. He did something cool.” They both broke the law. They both were illegal. Both were immoral. So just because someone is creative in what they do doesn’t mean what they do is ethical or right. So I try to remind people that are amazed by what I did that yes, it was creative, but it wasn’t right. It was the wrong thing to do. I try to remind myself that I was in a situation where I did that because it started out as survival and people started chasing me and I was this kid thinking: how do I stay ahead of all these people chasing me? But in the end, it was wrong what I did and I had to pay my debt to society for it.


Julian: I understand. You deal a lot now…your job with the FBI is to be able to track and try to essentially bring con artists to justice. You know, con artists always has this bad connotation, but it also has this sexy connotation. And I was wondering: from your perspective, do you always associate con artists with something negative and is there a personality characteristic that is consistent, that every person who is really good at conning people employs and has?


Frank: Okay, first of all, any good politician, any good car salesman, any good salesman, are con men. They have the same traits that a con man has. The only difference is that the con man is looking to get there very quickly and he’s willing to work outside the guidelines of the law. Whereas the salesman and politician, in many cases (not always), are trying to stay within, inside the line of the law and not do anything illegal. But the traits are the same. The only thing that you see now, in the last ten or fifteen years, is today the con man has kind of gone away because the day of the well-dressed, well-spoken, sophisticated guy or girl that was a con man, or con woman, because most of the people who are victimized today are victimized by someone thousands of miles away by somebody sitting in their pajamas on a laptop in their kitchen in Moscow, or India, or China, or somewhere in the United States. So the people really never see who’s stealing their money, who’s victimizing them or who’s conning them. They only know the voice or the words typed on the screen. So there isn’t so much…we don’t see any more of that con man because there is no more of that personal one on one. But I’ve always said if you show me a good politician, you show me a good car salesman, they’re the same personality traits as a con man. The only thing is they’re doing it within the means of the law and staying within the lines of making, doing something legal.


Julian. Yes. You have spoken in the past about when you talk about your past in con artistry, you are very remorseful for what you did and you bring up a lot of times the fact that you broke the law and what you did was not moral, and you’re very remorseful. But also what you did, you also say that you did what you did to survive, to be able to make it, and I wanted to ask you: you seem very…very remorseful at times in your interviews and in your speeches, but at the same time there’s a really good reason for you to have done what you did and you never hurt anybody. Why do you feel so remorseful?


Frank: Well, you know, I think…first of all, let me explain to you that people, no matter what you do in your life, and it’s unfortunate, but really don’t let you forget. So you know, people say…all your life you hear that life is short. But the truth is life is really long. I mean, someone…I’m sixty-nine years old. If I’m lucky, I might make it to ninety or so. Someone in a younger generation, like my children, they may live to be over a hundred years old. So when you make a mistake in your life and you do something wrong, you have to live with that for a long, long time, and even if you try not to live with it, people remind you about it. So I notice almost everything ever written about me—and probably why I don’t do a lot of interviews—no matter what I’ve done in my life, all people write about, and the headline will be, “World’s Greatest Con Man Says This…” or retired con man, or former con man, and mainly talk a lot about my past, but never talk about the things I’ve done over the past forty years. So people remind you of that all the time, so that’s why I tell young people you have to be…you don’t want to put a lot of burdens in your life. So you know, if you mistreat somebody in a relationship, or you lie to somebody, you deceive somebody, or you do something wrong, you know, it means nothing at the time you’re doing it, but later on in life, it comes back to kind of haunt you, and comes back to bother you, and you end up having these burdens in your life. So even if I was willing to forget all the things that I did, there will always be people there to remind me that I did and I understand that I did and that’s why I’m fine with living with that, but I always don’t lose sight of the fact that it was wrong.

I just, I tell people all the time when they look at my life or they watched the movie or they read the book, they’re amazed by or fascinated by what I did fifty years ago as a teenager. But the truth is at sixty-nine—and I just turned sixty-nine last week—when I turned sixty-nine and I look back on my life, I think to myself: the most amazing thing is that I did all these things…I went to prison for five years, the government took me out of prison, I’ve worked for my government for four decades, I’ve developed some incredible print technology, paper technology, as well as technology used for cyber defense, and I’ve done some amazing things in my life. I’ve been married to my one and only wife for forty-plus years, I’ve brought three wonderful sons into the world—one who is an FBI agent celebrating twelve years in the Bureau—I mean, I look back and say: this really happened? I mean, is this really where my life went and what happened in my life? And I think that says a lot about the country we live in. You can make mistakes. You can have problems. You can be an alcoholic. You can be a drug addict. But if you want to change your life, if you really want to do something with your life, at any stage in your life, you can change your life! Because we live in a great country that lets you do that. Yeah, people will remind you of your mistakes, but you can go do something positive with your life if you want to do it and in the end, you only do it for yourself, to prove to yourself that you can do something and not worry about what other people think about you. So I’m just grateful that I’ve been able to do something great with my life because sometimes I do believe that old saying about things happen in life for a reason. And I would obviously not be where I am today if all those things didn’t happen. So you know, I think that’s just part of life.


Julian: That’s a really good, positive statement about the country where you hear a lot of negativity these days. Frank, you don’t grant interviews very often, I know that from seeing your website and you said it before. May I ask you: why did you grant me this one?


Frank: I just, I have a very good sense of people, so when you…normally, to be very honest, this is a question that my assistant was asking me: why did you grant this interview? She kept reminding me every time I went about it today and…I have a sense of people. I met you, I got a feeling that you were the type of person that had a loving family, that you were somebody who cared about your family, cared about your country…I just got a very positive feeling about you and when you said, “Would you do this?” you know, I said yes right off the bat. Normally I just refer people to my office knowing that they’ll say no. And it’s…and the real reason, like I told you, the real reason I don’t do interviews…I mean, if you go back and see the interviews I’ve done, people just really…90% of the interview is really about things I did and my past. They really don’t care so much about what I’ve done with my life and go with my past and then they use these terms of…I always have to smile when somebody says, “The World’s Greatest Con Man.” When you think about it, you know, there’s people I have on my desk every day that embezzle from Medicare and Medicaid, and doctors, and people of that nature, who steal 30 million, 40 million, 50 million. You know, I stole pennies compared to these people and I’m sure they were probably better con men than I am. And we look at some of these politicians every day and realize some of them are a lot bigger con men than I would ever pretend to be, or be. So I get, I’m amused by that, but I felt very comfortable in giving you the interview and so I did it.


Julian: Thank you, Frank. The last question for you: what legacy would you like to leave on this earth when it’s all said and done? What do you want to be remembered by?


Frank: I only care about one thing to remembered by…not the world’s greatest con man. Not the world’s greatest government official. Not the greatest cyber guy or anything else. I only want to be remembered that he was a good husband, he was a good father, and he was a great Daddy to his children, and that’s really all I care about.


Julian: Frank Abagnale, thank you so much for giving me this interview.


Frank: Thank you, Julian.


Julian: Thank you for joining us on Improvisationally Speaking this week. Thank you especially Frank Abagnale for granting us the interview. I’m Julian Schrenzel. You’re listening to Improvisationally Speaking from Improv Alive! We’ll see you in a couple Fridays.

Improvisationally Speaking Episode 5 with special guest Jeff Duncan-Andrade

Dr. Jeff Duncan-Andrade, founder of Roses In Concrete, a community school that serves black and Hispanic, inner-city youth in Oakland CA, giving them an educational opportunity that rivals it’s wealthy suburban private school counterparts. With classes in dance, music performance and arrangement, and athletics, in addition to the core curriculum. Jeff is a national keynote speaker and his council is requested by education departments across the country who are trying to build a more just, equitable education system for all.

Improvisationally Speaking the Podcast Episode 4 with guest Seattle City Councilmember Mike O’Brien

Seattle City Council Member, Mike O’Brien has a tough but rewarding job. As a council member, it is his job to serve his constituency and to do what he knows is right. But sometimes doing both of these at the same time is impossible. How does he communicate effectively and effect the kind of change he is charged to bring to the city of Seattle while being under the microscope of the public eye? This discussion reveals some of Mike O’Brien’s methods, and they are surprisingly based on the principles of improvisation.